derision
Paul Graham's two latest essays are on Ambition and Distraction. I look forward to his thoughts on Uglification and Derision. (I'd bet a modest sum that the appearance of those topics next to one another is deliberate on PG's part.)
I suppose this is what they call a blog. Except that blogs are supposed to be updated more often than this is.
Feeds: Atom 1.0 (preferred), RSS 0.91. Front page: link.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul Graham's two latest essays are on Ambition and Distraction. I look forward to his thoughts on Uglification and Derision. (I'd bet a modest sum that the appearance of those topics next to one another is deliberate on PG's part.)
The new job is good so far. Really cool technology, interesting problems to solve, good people, still small enough to be fun.
We converted Heather's cot into a bed today. She's currently asleep on the floor of her room. Of course.
Excellent application of MD5-breaking technology.
Further to my earlier desultory comments on zombies, a contrary view. Lanier's main point is, I think, originally due to Hilary Putnam, though quite possibly Jaron Lanier thought of it independently.
I've always had a soft spot for Knuth's "literate programming", but it seems that I'm in a tiny minority. I'm pleased to find that the practice of LP is not entirely dead; for instance, there's a little community of people doing it, apparently for fun, in a wiki at literateprograms.org. But I think the right way to bring wikis and LP together is to make each section be its own page. Perhaps (though I rather doubt it) worthwhile literate programs could then be created in the same sort of informal ways as wikis are. And wrecked in the same sort of informal ways, too.